Disclaimers:

The articles and readings which are mine on this site, marked 'DJJ' or 'Uncle Davey', may be copied without editing or linked to, as long as I am credited as author and the same condition is placed on whoever copies it onwards. If profits are made, a fee at standard commercial rates must be directed to the following non-religious and non-related charity The UK Forces Gulf Fund with the donation not marked to this site or my person in any way. If the use is not for profit, there is no need for any donation, or any fee, but you should as ever cite the source and not distort it.

Where other copyright holders are involved, refer to me and I will put you in contact with them.

I am not liable under Hedley Byrne v Heller or any other similar case in any other system for losses arising on your decisions from opinions on this site. If you make investment decisions or business decisions you should refer to professional advisers in person.

Please note that there are off-site links which are not under my control, so I might not agree with some of the opinions or interpretations of fact given on those links.

DJJ

Search for free Internet domains

If you're a foreigner living in Poland, you're welcome to join the ::Foreigners living in Poland forum I've set up in Gazeta Wyborcza's portal.

Here you will find Usenetpost.com's joint audio mission with JCSM.org on Sermonaudio.com. For now, most of this is English Language material, but the intention is to gather much more Polish sermons on this broadcast medium, so please look back each month, as it will soon be taking off.

Uncle Davey's Fragmentia - 1^st Dectave

The idea of Fragmentia is to make a digest of the best fragments of the posts I have made to Usenet, whether ideas, soundbites, jokes and witticisms, observations, coinages, or even some typical Usenet "flames". The criterion for inclusion is that the extracts work without a lot of context setting, and also that either the use of language or the idea has some originality about it. All work is mine unless otherwise stated, and, with few exceptions, originally written for Usenet in the month given below each fragment. Where of interest, I have also given the person addressed. To see the original content, use Google's Usenet archive searching on the most unusual phrase in the section and limiting it to the stated month. Some of these comments were answered - even on occasion very competently, and looking up the thread will show you what my opponents said. Unlike other parts of my site, which have no paid advertising, if you want to advertise next to an item, let me know, the rates are here. Proceeds will used entirely towards site upkeep and expansion. The items are not especially sorted by topic, they are mixed together. There are up to ten fragments per page, and the rules of the game are that only spelling mistakes are corrected, no new thoughts are added. If you buy the books advertised down the left column, I get book tokens, apparently, and I'll try and do good things with them. You don't pay more, anyway. If there was a book you were planning to buy, and are as happy giving me the commission as anywhere else, for the same price, or if you want me to promote a book you've written or you recommend to other readers of this site, feel free to let me know what it is, and I'll get the button.

As ever, with my productions, the right of reply exists on the bulletin board. The fragments are not sorted, so a certain amount of disjointedness is part of the fun, but as you sequentially peruse each "Dectave of Uncle Dave", you'll soon start to pick up the threads.

Go to next page of Usenet fragmentia

"I would like to know how these Creation-rejectors are so sure that so-called 'pseudogenes' don't have a perfectly viable raison d'etre which they simply don't know about.

They are so ready to say "science is in its infancy" when it suits them, but if they think they've found a trap for us, then they are oh so certain that certain genes are redundant, that they are mistakes, that they would have been created out. Well why didn't they evolve out? What we don't use gets lost, right?

So what about the fact that only a small percentage of the human brain gets used? Why did the rest evolve, if it doesn't get used? Is the size of the human brain a pseudogene? Or is it a place to hang those parts of the soul that don't get needed until the resurrection body?

Creation rejectors think they know a lot of things, but when it all boils down to it, there's nothing they can say that proves the non-existence of God that they so long to achieve."

(December 2003)

"You're making distinctions that don't exist in the Hebrew. This is not dividing the Word, it's multiplying it, subtracting it and adding to it, and taking it to the n'th power, where n = nonsense."

(December 2003, addressed to Robert Sowle)

"Bacteria aren't the products of evolution, they're the products of devolution.

Most of the bacteria that attack humans are human cells or organelles of human cells that have gone wrong.

There is in the talk origins FAQ somewhere a discussion about a bacterium that evolved under scientific conditions from some woman's cells, and they rattle this out as proof of speciation sometimes. What it does prove is that human cells give rise to bacteria, which of course is devolution, the exact reverse of evolution. Hardly surprising not much of this is done and they don't like to emphasise it.

So with bacteria it's a bit like cancer only they move around with a life of their own. they can of course go on to speciate of their own accord, usually getting weaker, not stronger, and then the next devolution from a higher animal cell creates the next new disease, unknown before, as with the HIV retrovirus.

Probably this bacterium able to metabolise nylon, if it came from another bacterium not able to, was a devolution, or a falling away from, the other. It is probably a more basic organism than the parent organism. Weaker, not stronger.

These are devolved, not evolved, organisms. God never made them, as such, they were part of the human body, and other animal and plant bodies.

Same with viruses. They could not have been a part of the evolutionary chain as they need higher organism to survive on. They are rogue parts of DNA of higher organisms, that's how they are able to control the DNA of higher organisms.

Nematodes didn't evolve, they devolved from insects, that's how they know how to control the consciousness of their host insect and make it seek water. Such a mechanism could never have evolved by trial and error. Had the host not gone to water, that would have been the end of the line for that attempt. If it didn't need water, why make the host go there?

And all this devolving of life, which causes disease, decay and death, didn't start until after the Fall of Man."

(December 2003, addressed to H. R. Grümm)

"Is there a coffee so strong it will wake you out of this slumber?"

(December 2003, addressed to Robert Sowle)

"There are some 30,000 species. Had evolution been true, over 100 times that number could have evolved in the time they say is available.

The number of Biblical kinds involved here is probably closer to 3,000. They all started out as freshwater kinds and some became saltwater after the flood."

(December 2003, addressed to David Jensen)

"Mammals are a group of living creatures where there is body hair and the mother suckles the young with milk.

The building blocks God, as the prime Engineer, saw fit to use on them and on us are similar enough to allow a technical name in common, but the created purpose of mankind is one thing and of animals it is another.

Have you ever pondered the oddity that we alone are an intelligent species? I could not be having this conversation with an orang-utan or a sperm whale, however skilled the translator.

Why didn't evolution manage that for any other species?"

(December 2003)

"I thought your website and your work was great, but I have to say I disagree with you about subjecting Usenet to the same laws as the rest of society. These people need somewhere to go to let off steam. Better here than daub it on our fences.

Some people do have opinions which are not respectable and are antisocial, and most forums are not available to them. Nevertheless they want to give expression to their ideas, regardless of the quality, the same as anyone else does.

Sometimes the product of those expressions is quite disturbing, but that is the true face of your fellow man and neighbour on this planet. May as well be informed about it. You're never gonna be able to regulate and control it out of existence."

(December 2003, addressed to artist Amanda Angelika Berry)

"You may well be a nicer person than we are, but have you been forgiven your sins because of the Blood Jesus shed for you on Calvary?

It's not about being nice, it's about being forgiven.

That's how we see Christianity, anyway. See John 3.16"

(December 2003, addressed to self-confessed witch "Jason Harvestdancer")

"All I can tell you is that my wife keeps silent in Church, although she does sometimes laugh if there's a joke in the sermon.

If I asked her to speak publicly in the Church she would consider that 'spousal abuse' and not the reverse.

But then, she is a well-balanced woman, not like some women, trying to be men.

I honestly pity the men they marry, few will be spared mental illness at some stage in their lives.

Does that make me an ultraconservative?"

(December 2003)

"There was no time as we know it prior to Creation, and as Christ is an uncreated being, He also exists outside of constraints of time and space."

(December 2003)